Thorndike's Cat
Thorndike,
E. L. (1898)
Another behaviourist,
American researcher Edward Thorndike believed learning
occurred through the process of trail and error. He
suggested that responses to situations are made largely
at random; eventually the right one will occur and be
rewarded, increasing the likelihood of that behaviour
being performed in the future. In order to test his
theory, Thorndike developed his infamous Puzzle Box.
Cat Inna Box
A cat in a puzzle box
The cat is put into a box
that can only be opened if the outside latch is opened (by
putting a paw through the gap from inside) and the bolt is
pulled back (by pressing on a pedal). At first, the cats
move around in a 'random' fashion because they don't know
how to get out. Eventually by accident they will press the
pedal and push the latch, and can escape the box to eat
the tasty food outside. By associating those two actions
with a positive outcome, the behaviour is reinforced: push
pedal + open latch = food. Next time the cat is put in the
box (this happened a lot) it is more likely to do perform
these actions again because of the association with food.
The cat gets quicker at opening the box as it 'learns'
(the association between behaviour and food becomes
stronger). This produces a 'learning curve', and the
trail-and-error approach is known as 'instrumental
conditioning'.
(image
from www.psywww.com)
Black Box Mind
Thorndike claimed the cat had
no idea about the connection between its actions and
possible consequences, because when the cat first goes in
the box its behaviour is largely erratic. If it knew about
a link, Thorndike suggested it would show some kind of
systematic approach to getting out of the box, such as
repeatedly attacking the door. The cats never demonstrated
an obvious strategy or sudden flash of realisation,
therefore his conclusions were that:
a) there is no 'mind' to
house mental processes that control behaviour
b) patterns of behaviour
where only engaged in because of their association with
positive outcomes.
The first point can be thought of as a premature
conclusion for a relatively new science, like the 'world
is flat' theory. Early psychologists denied the existence
of a thinking 'mind', instead claiming that practically
all behaviour was the result of learning to associate
certain situations with negative outcomes (and avoiding
them, e.g. the Little Albert
experiment) and other situations with positive
outcomes (such as in Pavlov's
dogs experiment). The mind was largely ignored in
early psychology, being thought of more as a 'black box'.
The second point is one of the fundamental principles of
psychology, as it is something that is relatively easy to
observe and manipulate in a wide variety of situations.
Thorndike trialled his puzzle
box on a number of animals, including dogs, monkeys,
chickens and, strangely, fish, finding that each produced
the same kind of S-shaped learning curve. Although each
species took a different number of trials to 'solve' the
box, because the shape of the graph was the same it was
suggested as evidence that different species learn the
same way.
See Also
A video of Thorndike's
experiment can be watched here
on YouTube.
An expert from Thorndike's essay "Animal Intelligence:
An experimental study of the associate processes in
animals" (1898), in which this experiment is reported,
can be read here.
This article was also incorporated into his book "Animal
Intelligence: Experimental studies” (1911), which is
available for preview on Google Books.